Dark Night of the Scarecrow
A rural posse, led by a morally bankrupt mailman, decide to hunt down a simple-minded man-child, allowing their hatred for him to motivate a heinous cold-blooded murder, four guns unloading on a helpless individual over a crime he didn't commit. But what they aren't prepared for, even after a court of law lets them off, is the return of the scarecrow.
*****
To me a really good-to-great horror film has to have aspects
that captivate or compel me. Mario Bava’s visual power, Argento’s visceral
outbursts in beautiful color and crazed developments inflicted upon those who
are unaware of the evil in their midst, Gordon’s willingness to go to those
dark places and show how his characters respond to the ugliness that usurps
them, Cohen’s absurd plots within realistic settings and everyday characters
experiencing extraordinary situations, Hooper’s assault on the senses in how
his characters encounter the macabre through startling horror, Romero’s
examination of a world gone to hell and his characters succumbing to their dark
half, etc.
I think what makes Dark Night of the Scarecrow so effective, so
chilling, and so compelling is its building of suspense through what you don’t
see (the killer) and how guilt/fear can work against those who take law into
their own hands without thoroughly thinking things through. Hollywood has been churning out horror films (as has the Asian film market which I think has mastered it) based on a ghost seeking revenge for a wrong that happened to them in life. Similar somewhat to a slasher film, the killer picks off its victims one by one while they are unaware that doom was coming for them. What I felt has been so lasting and spooky about this film is how we know that those who took the law into their own hands will get their just do. We are aware that perhaps Bubba is coming and Durning will get what's coming to him. So it is all about how to build each death scene where the creeping feeling of death is somewhere close, with each character that was a part of the posse receiving the sentence they're due.
What the opening of
the film does is establish what has been happening to a gentle-hearted,
simple-minded man-child who is best friends with a little girl with whom he
shares about the same level of maturity and competence. If anything Bubba
(Larry Drake, of Dr. Giggles and LA Law fame) is perhaps less mature and
competent than the little girl. Charles Durning is immediately shown with binoculars
spying on the two of them, but question is why? Why is Durning so invested in
these two? Does he really care about the little girl or is he just a busybody,
sadistic bully with racism towards special needs people? He calls Drake a
blight but there’s no sign that he has ever did anything wrong. Drake
considered an insect by Durning worthy of permanent extinction he tells farmer
Lane Smith. Smith, with beer in hand, is ready to go “teach Bubba a lesson”
when Durning tells him that he was with the little girl again.
So what this
does is establishes that there’s a distinct and troubling disdain for a
mentally retarded and wholly innocent man with the intellect and behavior of a
ten year old. He wouldn’t harm a soul. When the little girl wants to sneak through
a picket fence into a yard she isn’t supposed to, Bubba knows it’s wrong and
refuses to do the same. What the little girl doesn’t realize is that a guard
dog is in the yard and it lunges at her, attacking her into injury. Bubba
rescues her and takes the little girl to her mom’s, letting her know he was not
responsible. Smith flies over to the post office to tell Durning that “Bubba
has killed her” which is a falsity.
Not getting the right details leads to an
innocent man being murdered without a proper process of law. So Durning, who
has been waiting for a moment like this because his heart is so black and his
soul is so cruel, gets a chance to put together a posse of rural townsmen to go
after Bubba as he was obviously responsible for the missing girl. Hiding in a
scarecrow, Bubba is trapped and the men, packing guns, kill him. A gas station
attendant and a feed operator are among the posse. They seem to be salivating
at the chance to hunt down Bubba and render their brand of justice against the
poor guy. The film really builds sympathy for Drake as he runs through the
woods in absolute terror as the dogs in the back of a truck driven by the posse
follows close behind. The wreath of flowers put around his neck by the little
girl still around Bubba as he falls to the ground, sucking wind and knowing
that the bad men are closing in.
This film, Dark Night of the Scarecrow, builds
a sympathetic character that doesn’t deserve his mistreatment. You have the men
with no right whatsoever chasing after Bubba, using the little girl’s injury as
an excuse to go after someone they despise (just because he’s “different” than
them) and hurt him. Durning is perfect casting as the loathsome lead villain.
He plays one of those small little men with a small little insignificant life
and through the misery he inflicts (or imagines inflicting) upon someone even
smaller than he is, there is a bit of satisfaction that can be assured through
the pain he offers. There’s a sense in the dialogue shared by Durning and Lane
in their first scene together that they have picked on Bubba before. They
consider him a nuisance unworthy to exist, and so it was only a matter of time
before the right set of circumstances provided them the ammunition to act out
to their own volition.
An indictment on vigilante justice, bullying, unfair
criticism, racism against the mentally handicapped, the justice system (the
vigilantes get off on a technicality despite their involvement in the murder of
Bubba), Dark Night of the Scarecrow has a lot of weaponry to use to unleash the
dead spirit of a wronged victim, and the justice not exacted in the court room
will be visited upon the posse in other ways. That is why I’m such a horror
fan. This genre has a way of allowing the unjust to get justice, the Scarecrow
karma itself returning to haunt and execute those who committed a crime (21
bullets went into Bubba while he hung there on that wooden cross, Drake’s
frightened eyes and quivering, the slight cries of his innocence.)
What makes Durning so
entirely despicable is how, after he learns of Bubba’s innocence, he plants a
pitchfork on his dead person hand, absurdly proclaiming on the stand in a court
of law how the posse had no choice but to fire on the innocent man. All the
prosecutor could do was point out the obvious but the judge throws out his case
due to no evidence or witnesses who could corroborate Bubba’s murder and their
participation in it.
Durning’s Otis Hazelrigg is even accused by Bubba’s mom
(Jocelyn Brando) for unseemly looks at the little girl, Marylee (Tonya Crowe).
It makes sense, if you think about it. Marylee was friends with Bubba so Otis
couldn’t be, and with his binoculars, it is a rather disturbing thought, but
just the same possibly accurate. With a bust of Napoleon (!), photo of Patton,
and this gun case inside this itty, bitty boarding house room he lives, Otis is
a pathetic creep. Lane Smith’s farmer, Harliss Hocker, sees a scarecrow out in
the yet-to-be-harvested field, asked by his wife why it would be out there.
That night he would hear a noise in his barn, go to investigate (big no-no), go
into a loft to follow this sound, trip over some hay, attempt to hang from a
light, and fall into a running brush machine which would saw him up good. While
the gore is obviously not shown due to this being a CBS movie, it doesn’t have
to be. That the machine was off when his body is discovered lends itself to the
idea that someone (or something) contributed to his death. With the scarecrow
showing up in a field near Philby’s (Claude Earl Jones) feed station, the
remaining members of the posse are starting to worry. Gas attendant Skeeter
(Robert F Lyons) is basically an easy-to-goad foil for Otis while Philby is a
victim of his own guilty conscience. Knowing that Philby and Skeeter are
starting to crack, Otis confronts Bubba’s mom, and this is where it seems to go
in his favor. He sneaks up behind her, scaring her; threatening to kill her if
she doesn’t stop tormenting them, she suffers a coronary! So Otis turns on the
gas of the stove, and with the fireplace burning strong, the house explodes.
Are his problems solved? Not by a long shot.
Philby’s fate in a feed silo is rather ingenious and horrifying
if you think about how that would be to watch as it comes down on top of you,
with drowning the result. Just an extended arm and flashlight remaining in
sight.
Then there’s Skeeter who is
working on a car when Otis pays him a visit. Convincing Skeeter to accompany
him to Bubba’s grave, they dig it up and take a look inside the coffin. When it
appears Skeeter is so hysterical he would go to the local authorities so it
would all end, Otis decides to rid himself of this problem as well. But seeing
Marylee in the middle of the road, following her into a field where he crashes
into a tree, Otis wants his hands on the little girl, believing she is the one
behind all the trouble caused to them. Then comes a farming machine chasing
Otis…right into a scarecrow, except this time the pitchfork won’t be just a
prop.
Then there is that marvelous final scene. Marylee and the
scarecrow share a flower. The way the scarecrow moves itself to face her, that
sound is real spooky stuff. She continues to talk to “Bubba” as the credits
roll.
No matter how much Otis tries to cover up his crime, he will
not escape what he deserves. The horror genre has a way of letting us see
vengeance unfold, even in ways quite unique. While it is obvious with the final
reel that the scarecrow is in fact responsible, for a while there it was
possible that perhaps someone else might have done it. That wouldn’t have been
as satisfying, though, as Bubba getting revenge on them for what they did to
him. That the final kill had the irony of using the pitchfork was another,
among many, slick touches the film applies.
To really get under our skin, the posse, after being found
not guilty due to nothing evidentiary against them, exits the courtroom to a
cheering group of townsfolk. All smiles, the four are in a bar celebrating,
while an awakening wind stirs to a roar outside. Later on Otis rubs it in by
having Bubba’s mama sign a package and warn her to leave them be. These touches
are ways to really infuriate the viewer and get on the side of the scarecrow.
It works. To do what they did and go on with their lives like nothing happened,
the horror genre had a way to not allow what real life might: the posse will
pay.
"A rural posse led by a morally bankrupt mailman" That opening gave me a good laugh, B! I know the film well so I know where you were going, but a line like that in the abstract sounds pretty funny. It could be the opening of a description of a comedy.
ReplyDeleteI saw this one way back in 1981 or '82, when it originally debuted. It has stayed with me ever since--easily one of the high-points of made-for-tv horror. I read how you first came across this one, but you didn't say when. If it was recently, I'm surprised youl'd never heard of it. This one is all creepy atmosphere. The scarecrow terrorizing the guy with the weak heart in broad daylight--oh yeah. Durning's death is particularly well-handled, and I love the last scene with the little girl. If you saw a broadcast version of this, there's a good chance it was missing some footage. It originally ran something like 96 minutes; some of the time-reduced versions are less than 90. Not so much critical material missing but there's a delicate balance with an atmosphere piece. Get the disc. It has a great commentary with the film's creator.
I am glad you pointed that out. I will go back and edit that in. It was right around maybe 93 or 94. This was the VHS version that might currently be available on youtube. The film I watched the first time was an obvious edit on TBS.
ReplyDeleteI called him a moral junkheap in the other blog post, haha. I think it is funny, to tell you the truth; the touch with him being a postal worker, the job allowing him to snoop through mail and spy on everybody. He's quite a creep.
That would make a cool title for a movie--"The Immoral Mailman."
DeleteHaha. I'm pretty sure if we were to look hard enough, there's more than one movie about an immoral mailman...even perhaps that very title.
ReplyDeleteExcellent review! I recently came across this film for the first time and found it to be an excellent little film. The beginning with Bubba and what happens to him is actually heartwrenching, really hit at me on an emotional level.
ReplyDeleteThe deaths that follow, I enjoyed the ambiguity of what stalked them. We know and still we have our own doubts. Some films I feel pile on too much of the reveal of the killer and DNOTS goes in the exact opposite direction.
The atmosphere is fantastic and the ending, endearingly sweet. That rare film which does so much on so little, reading this review certainly pepped up my mood. Wonderful to read! :-D