A Werewolf, Frankenstein Monster, and Water Turbine Ruins
If you watched “The
Wolf Man” (1941) enough, Patric Knowles will be familiar since he was a rival
to Larry Talbot for the affections of Gwen; in “Frankenstein Meets the Wolf Man”
(1943), he’s a Cardiff doctor who eventually follows Talbot to Vasaria, a
village still turned off at the mere mention of the name Frankenstein. I
lsa is
played in the “sequel” to “The Wolf Man” and “The Ghost of Frankenstein” by
Ilona Massey (Ankers played the Ilsa character in Ghost), eventually
confronting Knowles’ Dr. Mannering at the ruins when he starts up her father’s
machines, in the process of “recharging” the Monster (Lugosi in close-ups but
never in action sequences involving physical confrontation or stunts).
One of
those Universal Studios’ tropes, repeated in sequels, is the doctors who seem
emboldened to give a fierce, powerful, extremely dangerous killing machine (no
longer the misunderstood Karloff creature) strength and vitality. Why would
they want to do that? What purpose after Dr. Mannering and Ilsa noticed at the
Vasaria during the “Festival of the Wine” when the Monster was on his customary
rampage as villagers scattered like frightened rabbits would the doctor want to
give him further power and strength than he had already? Never made sense to
me.
What I like about Siodmak’s script is the limited “man who is pure at heart”
callback to the first film and seeing the Wolf Man in a more modern Cardiff
location before joining Ouspenskaya’s Maleva for a wagon journey to Vasaria
back to the familiar Universal Monster movies environs we are all accustomed
to. Granted, the Vasaria castle ruins with a water turbine, seemingly built by
Hardwicke’s Frankenstein (well, this sequel to Ghost is fleeting at best
as the ruins look absolutely nothing like the sanitarium/home of Hardwicke and
Ilsa), is quite a modern looking creation. But Vasaria has modern Cardiff
touches, also. Universal Studio Monster films do sort of mix the past and
current architectural and clothing designs so that they are more “timeless” and
less dated.
I do think the early scenes in Cardiff give “Frankenstein Meets the
Wolf Man” a uniqueness not associated with other sequels, except for maybe “Dracula”
(1931) and “Dracula’s Daughter” (1936). Well, you might include “Son of Dracula”
(1943) in that if you so wish. Seeing the Wolf Man in a setting that might
feature Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson looking to solve a cobblestone street
crime (had to throw this in there since the director of “Frankenstein Meets the
Wolf Man” was Roy William Neill) just captivates me personally.
This film gave
Dwight Frye (who would die in 1943) a villager role where he doesn’t have to
behave like a crazy, more or less in conversation about the Frankenstein ruins
and the werewolf killing with Atwill’s mayor of Vasaria. Atwill, much like
Frye, would be dead before the 40s were over. We are basically seeing some of
the most notable horror character actors in their final film work. I would love
to say that what Frye does in this film is thrilling but it is essentially a
walk-on part with some dialogue.
Rex Evans as the portly pub owner, Vazec, gets
more to do, such as aggravate Chaney’s Talbot when he learns that Dr.
Frankenstein is dead—Maleva felt if anyone could help Talbot “die” it would be
the infamous scientist—and blow up a dam that capsizes what is left of the
Frankenstein ruins. He had a daughter killed by the Wolf Man. There is a key
dialogue scene where Dr. Mannering tells Talbot that he followed his “trail”
with paper clippings…the Wolf Man left behind a series of murders. And Ilsa is
brought to Vasaria by Atwill’s mayor when Talbot wants to lure her to the ruins
with a fake proposal to buy the property. So you do have paper clippings,
telephones (used in Cardiff and Llenwally), and property rights, as well as a
water turbine. So there are plenty of modern touches that sort of dabble with
the European Gothic.
While not in the film except at the opening half of the
film, Dennis Hoey of the Holmes/Watson Universal series does leave an
impression as Inspector Owen, of Cardiff, seemingly incapable of keeping a
straight face when he’s told by a dead serious, and nearly unhinged, Talbot of
his werewolvery. Owen is the perfect character for such revelations, as if his
Scotland Yard inspector is being told of Baskerville hounds, laughing them off
as just too unrealistic to believe. Knowles’ Mannering leaves him behind,
pursuing Talbot, eventually interrupted by Ilsa when he’s about to fuel
Frankenstein Monster with way too much electric energy.
But Talbot and Maleva,
on the road, was a fun concept to me, touched on before arriving at Vasaria.
The gypsy and her "son", on the road to Frankenstein's castle...writes itself. Eventually Maleva is left out of the film as Mannering and Ilsa hope to help
the village be rid of the Monster, while Talbot also wants “release”.
Very
little of Lugosi as the Monster (his “acting knees” cut out from under him due
to production alterations where he never has a voice during the film and
conversations removed) and a small fight before the ruins are flooded in a
makeshift Frankenstein lab are more than a bit underwhelming. Lugosi never
really got a second chance.
Chaney does that Talbot suffering performance the
entire film…he’s always miserable, as to be expected. Still the Wolf Man in
Cardiff, within a cemetery, in the Frankenstein lab, and face to face with the
Monster are some cool Universal Studios highlights. I can’t imagine what it
must have been like for Siodmak to try and make sense of how the Monster and
Talbot could return. This film also comments that Sir John Talbot died of
grief, having believed he “killed” his son. Atwill almost plays the same
character in every Universal sequel, a sort of irritated constable or authority
figure trying to keep the villagers in line. There is a villagers with “torches”
(this time lanterns lit) in Vasaria as Vazec carries his dead daughter in his
arms that might remind viewers of “Frankenstein” (1931).
That’s a wrap.
Comments
Post a Comment