Haunter
**½
That serial killer continues to “haunt” Breslin’s Lisa,
warning her to not pursue “escape from limbo” or he will hurt her and her
family with a severe punishment. Lisa realizes that the killer (veteran Stephen
McHattie, who can portray these menacing parts in his sleep and walk away with
a film) “occupies” (maybe “preys upon” is better?) the human bodies of fathers,
causing them to volcanically outburst until he successfully destroys the lives
of the living even after death (he died in ’83).
Lisa will need to first convince her family to accept their
deaths in order to move on, and then attempt to rescue a family currently
living in their house. McHattie’s Edgar doesn’t want Lisa to shake apart this
repetitive, never-ending, eternal cycle; this façade that allows Edgar to
continually prey on the living because no one “existing where he is” will put
an end to his “terror from beyond the grave”. This will need to be shattered if Lisa
is to stop him.
The point of dark spirits terrorizing families in the house that
was (and continues to be) his domain is at the heart of what drives this “paranormal
mystery thriller”, and because McHattie can effortlessly conjure sinister with
relative ease when on screen (or just through a reptilian smile or that
voice so rich with malevolence), Haunter isn’t a total waste of time.
Haunter has The Others written all over it (except a sunnier
conclusion for this family left tragically adrift until Lisa stood up against
the boogeyman), and it is most definitely a PG-13 thriller I can only imagine
with get picked up by Lifetime Movie Channel to show in a line-up of horror films
(they have recently followed a trend towards showing haunted house and
psychopath thrillers of this variety on the network to appeal to a broader
audience than just the female demographic interested in made-for-cable stuff
starring fading television/movie stars) eventually. I liked Breslin here. I
did. She has range which is definitely needed in horror if actresses are
certain to keep our attention when films ask us to invest in their mission to
escape the clutches of evil. She benefits exponentially from McHattie’s
antagonist. A good antagonist goes a long way to setting up a developing terror
scenario and fitting conclusion that sees him terminated from any more
wrongdoing, whether in life or death committing his horrible deeds.
This film does remind me of Onryo films where a haunting leads to the finalization of a long-term paranormal problem that manifests and torments until the truth is realized. In Haunter, it is Edgar's activities. He was responsible for the murder of his own parents, kidnapping and murders of teenage girls around the area where he lives, and even after dying his handiwork with ether hadn't stopped (he tells Lisa that his targets still become "part of his collection"). The perfect murder masquerading as a father killing his family and himself; the preposterous notion that a ghost is inhabiting that father and causing all that provides Edgar with the perfect scapegoat.
Saying all that, Haunter
never felt like that big a deal which is why it never caught on fire, I guess,
but it’s not badly made (nice photography and lighting that carefully
establishes that the place for which Lisa exists has a sense of foreboding; captivating
use of narrative in how Breslin’s Lisa “enters/exits” the modern day Olivia and
sees through her body a whole other family and place; disorienting use of the
camera to parlay how off Lisa’s current status inside her torturous abode truly
is; enchanting close ups of Breslin’s face often expressively concerned/bewildered/frustrated/desperate) or acted, so those are pluses in its
favor. Not necessarily all that memorable, and I’m pretty sure after a few days
Haunter will slide into the fading
abyss of my attention, into oblivion. So am I endorsing the film? Sort of. Not
a bad experience, but Haunter isn’t what I consider lasting.
Comments
Post a Comment